Peer Review Policy

Jurnal SAINTEKOM implements a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and reliability of every article published. This process aims to provide a trusted platform for researchers to share their latest research findings and insights in the field of law.

Characteristics of Peer Review:

• Each submitted article undergoes evaluation by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in fields relevant to the article's topic.
• The identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential (double-blind review) to prevent bias in the evaluation process.
• Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and contributions to the scientific community.

Evaluation Criteria:

• Originality and authenticity of the scientific contribution.
• Robustness of research methods and relevance to the topic discussed.
• Clarity and accuracy in interpreting results.
• Contribution to the advancement of thought and practice in law.

Editorial Decision:

• The editor is responsible for making editorial decisions based on the results of the peer review process.
• Decisions may include: accepted without revision, accepted with minor/major revisions, or rejected.
• Authors will be provided with constructive feedback to improve their articles if necessary.

Commitment to Quality:

• We are committed to maintaining high standards in our peer review process.
• We value the constructive contributions of reviewers who help enhance the quality of published articles.
• We support authors to ensure the publication of high-quality articles that benefit the scientific community and practitioners.

We invite researchers, academics, and practitioners in the field of law to participate in our peer review process and contribute to advancing knowledge and practice in this area.